B2B sales audit: find out where your company loses clients
For B2B technology and service companies where clients come from referrals and the results depend on the owner. We examine five areas of sales on your real data.
One conversation, no obligations. If an audit makes no sense in your case, we will say so plainly.
On this page
- Who this audit is for
- What a sales audit is
- What we examine: 5 areas, 4 levels
- We do not ask. We ask for evidence
- How the audit works step by step
- What you get and what the report looks like
- What happens after the audit
- When an audit makes no sense
- Audit versus training, consulting and CRM
- 10 things we find most often
- Frequently asked questions
Who a sales audit is for, and who it is not for
The TechMine sales audit is designed for one type of company. The further you are from this description, the less you will get out of it.
It makes sense if
- You sell technology or complex B2B services
- Clients come mainly from referrals and networking
- If there is a sales team, its results are not predictable
- Revenue has stayed at a similar level, or grown slightly, for a few years
- You want to know what to fix first, not to hear that you “need to do more”
It makes no sense if
- You are looking for confirmation of a decision you have already made
- You do not want a real, objective assessment of the situation
- The company does not have a repeatable business model yet
- You sell in e-commerce or retail. That is not our field.
- The company is not ready to act on the conclusions
What is a sales audit?
A sales audit is a structured examination of how a company wins and closes clients, based on data rather than declarations. It checks strategy, process, communication, tools and the numbers, establishes the maturity level of each of these areas, points to the places where revenue leaks out and arranges the recommended actions in order of their impact on results.
The concept is not a consultants’ invention. It derives from the marketing audit described by Philip Kotler, William Gregor and William Rodgers in 1977, and its sales version was described by Alan Dubinsky and Richard Hansen in “The Sales Force Management Audit” (California Management Review, 1981). Kotler set four conditions an audit has to meet to deserve the name: it must be comprehensive, systematic, independent and periodic.
The last condition is the one most often neglected in practice. A one-off opinion with no improvement loop and no second measurement is not an audit, just a document. That is why at TechMine the sales audit can be ordered with a 90-day follow-up review.
A note on terminology. This page is about auditing the sales function of a B2B company. We do not audit retail outlets, merchandising or run mystery shopping in retail. That is a different discipline, despite the same name.
What exactly we examine: 5 areas and 4 maturity levels
The audit assesses five areas of sales and places each of them separately on a four-level maturity scale. Instead of one general score you get a map: you can see which area is pulling the others down and where the first changes are worth making.
Four maturity levels
| Level | Name | Hard criterion |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intuitive | There is no process. There is a set of activities. The result depends on the owner and on who happened to call. |
| 2 | Reactive | The process exists on paper, in a presentation, in someone’s head. Nobody monitors or enforces it. |
| 3 | Managed | The process is monitored, reinforced and enforced. Deviations are visible immediately. |
| 4 | Scalable | The process is managed and continuously optimized based on data. Sales are ready to scale. |
The line between level 2 and level 3 is the only one that matters.
The test is not whether a process exists. The test is whether it is monitored, reinforced and enforced. Most of the B2B companies we examine are convinced they are at level 3. Once the evidence is checked, they turn out to be at level 1 or 2.
Five areas of the examination
1. Strategy
Who your target client is and whether the answer to that question is the same at board level, among managers and among salespeople. Segmentation, value proposition, competitive advantage, pricing policy, sales methodology.
Evidence: the strategy document, revenue breakdown by segment, the go-to-market concept per segment.
2. Process
Sales stages, goals, stage exit definitions, qualification, objection handling, follow-up. We check what the sales process looks like and how it works in practice.
Evidence: delivery of the numerical targets at each stage, conversion rates, time spent in each stage, other key indicators.
3. Communication
How you talk about what you sell. The Value Triangle in practice, the quality of proposals, sales materials, prospecting, influence on the client’s buying process.
Evidence: call recordings, proposals, outbound sequences, follow-ups.
4. Tools
Whether the CRM is a notebook or a tool. Automations, integrations, completeness and quality of data, response times.
Evidence: configuration review, completeness of fields, time from a lead appearing to the first contact, a test enquiry sent through your own form.
5. Measurement
Indicators, forecast, pipeline, management dashboard, coaching, win and loss analysis. Time to feedback and analysis.
Evidence: sales forecasts set against actuals over 12 months, distribution of sales plan delivery by salesperson, loss reasons from the CRM.
In the end: one map
Five areas, a level from 1 to 4 in each, plus a justification based on specific evidence. A company at level 3 in Strategy and level 1 in Measurement has completely different priorities from a company with the opposite pattern, even though both “have a problem with sales”.
We do not ask whether you have a process. We ask for data from practice
This is the main thing that separates an audit from a diagnostic conversation. Every “yes” has to be backed by an artefact: a data export, a call recording, a document or a number.
The reason is mundane: companies systematically rate themselves higher than their data shows. In a Bain study of around 1,300 sales executives (2025), 82% of companies declared they used structured sales practices, and only 21% actually did. In a behavioural test run on 433 B2B companies, just 7% responded to an enquiry within five minutes, although the vast majority believe they react quickly. This is not a matter of dishonesty. That is simply what self-assessment looks like.
We measured the same gap ourselves, on the Polish market. In the TechMine study on needs discovery in B2B companies, a survey among owners and C-level executives, 91% of respondents considered needs discovery important or very important (an average of 4.56 out of 5), and 82% declared it was a mandatory element of their sales process. In the same survey only 32% of companies had a fully standardized needs discovery process, 55% admitted they sometimes present a proposal without discovering needs, and 66% submit a proposal despite knowing that the solution does not fit the client’s situation.
That is textbook level 2: the obligation is declared, the process does not exist, and the exception to the rule happens in more than half of the cases. Nobody is lying here, the declarations simply describe intent rather than practice. A sales audit examines practice.
If something cannot be shown in the data, we mark it as declared without objective evidence.
How the sales audit works step by step
-
1Days 1-2
Scope and data
We agree exactly what we examine and who the decision partner is on your side. We receive access to the data or exports, call recordings and sales documents. We sign an NDA if you need one.
-
2Days 3-7
Data analysis
Export of opportunities with stage change history, stage-by-stage conversion, time in stage, distribution of plan delivery, forecasts set against actuals, loss reasons, discounts. This is where the first version of the hypotheses emerges, and this is where it most often turns out that the problem is somewhere other than everyone thought.
-
3Days 6-12
Interviews and recordings
We talk to the board, the managers and the salespeople: the best one, an average one and the weakest one, not only the star of the team. We listen to recordings of sales calls and read the latest proposals. In parallel we send an enquiry through your own form and measure what happens.
-
4Days 12-16
Assessment and priorities
We set the maturity level in each of the five areas and justify it with evidence. We arrange the findings by three criteria: impact on revenue, difficulty of implementation and time to the first effect.
-
5Days 16-21
Report and review session
We meet for a session where we discuss the sales audit report and go through it point by point, with room for your “that will not work here”.
What you get and what the report looks like
- Report with findings: several dozen pages. Every finding has evidence attached: a number, a quote from a conversation or a screenshot from the CRM
- Maturity map: a level from 1 to 4 in each of the five areas, with justification
- Priority list: findings ranked by impact on revenue, difficulty and time to effect.
- Recommendations: what, who and by when. Written so that you can implement them on your own
- Review session: a meeting where we go through the report point by point
What happens after the audit
The audit ends with priorities arranged by impact on revenue and recommendations on what to change first. What you do with those recommendations is up to you.
If you want to be sure the recommendations do not stay on paper, you can add a 90-day follow-up review: we come back, check on the same data what has actually changed, and update the maturity levels. This is the same periodicity condition Kotler set for the audit back in 1977, and the only thing that really protects against producing a report for the shelf.
And if after the audit you decide you want help with implementation, we have SalesMachine. That is a separate decision, a separate conversation and a separate contract.
When a sales audit makes no sense
Three situations in which we advise against an audit, regardless of how well the company fits the profile.
- You are in the middle of changing your business model. The audit would examine sales that will not exist in six months. Wait until the new model has gone through its first dozen or so transactions.
- You already know what is wrong and you have the mandate to change it. Then an audit only postpones action. Do what you believe is right and come back in a quarter.
- Nobody except you thinks there is a problem. A report the team does not accept will not change anything. First comes agreement that something is worth changing.
Audit versus training, consulting and tool implementation
Four different things that regularly blur together in sales conversations.
| What it gives you | When it is the right choice | |
|---|---|---|
| Sales audit | An evidence-based diagnosis and an order of actions | You do not know where the problem lies, or you suspect it lies somewhere other than everyone says |
| Training | Skills in specific people | You know the problem is execution at the level of the sales conversation, not the process, the offer or the segment |
| Consulting / advisory | Ongoing support in decisions and implementation | You already have the diagnosis and need someone to help you carry it out |
| Application implementation | A tool and its configuration | The process is defined and enforced, and what is missing are the tools to support it |
The costliest of the common mistakes: buying training as the answer to a structural problem. If salespeople have no defined process, no clarity on whom they sell to and why, no workshop on sales techniques will fix that. It will improve the execution of activities that lead in the wrong direction anyway.
10 things we see most often
This is not a theoretical list. These findings repeat in B2B companies regardless of industry, and most of them are confirmed by market research.
- 01
The process exists, but nobody enforces it
The most common single finding. Level 2, not 3, and the company is convinced it is the other way round.
- 02
Qualification is a fiction
Qualification criteria are sometimes written into the CRM, but in Ebsta’s data analysis only 15% of opportunities were actually qualified according to them.
- 03
The pipeline is inflated
In an Objective Management Group study, even for the best salespeople only 40% of late-stage opportunities survived independent verification; for weak ones, 16%.
- 04
The forecast does not forecast
Fewer than 20% of organizations achieve sales forecast accuracy of 75% or higher (Korn Ferry / CSO Insights, 2021).
- 05
The manager is the best salesperson, not a manager
Sales Management Association study: on average 36 minutes of coaching per week per salesperson, less than 8% of a manager’s time.
- 06
Single-threaded selling
In Ebsta’s analyses, won deals had on average 9 contacts on the client side at the solution presentation stage; lost deals had 2.
- 07
You lose to no decision, not to competitors
An analysis of 2.5 million recorded calls (Challenger/JOLT) indicates that 40-60% of losses are the client making no decision.
- 08
The lead response comes too late
In the classic HBR study, contact within an hour gave roughly a sevenfold higher chance of continuation than later. This can almost always be checked in five minutes, and the result almost always surprises.
- 09
Discount as a closing tool
In Ebsta’s data, early discounting was associated with a 39% drop in win rate across the analysed deals.
- 10
No feedback loop from lost deals
The loss reason is entered by the person who lost, so “price” dominates in the CRM and the company never learns what really happened.
Frequently asked questions about the sales audit
A full sales audit at TechMine takes two to three weeks, counting from the opening meeting to the report review session. On your side it is around 8-16 hours, spread over that whole period.
The time depends mainly on the state of the data. A company with a tidy CRM and recorded calls fits into two weeks. A company where the transaction history lives in a spreadsheet and in the salespeople’s heads needs three.
We price it individually, because the scope of an audit really does differ between companies. Four things affect the price: the scale of the organization, the existing sales structures, how systematized the data is, the number of client segments and the number of value propositions that have to be examined separately.
A company with one segment, one value proposition and two people in sales is a completely different workload from a company selling three different things to three different client groups through separate teams. We give the specific amount after a free conversation in which we agree the scope.
No. The audit is a self-contained product. It ends with a report and a review session.
If after the audit you decide you want help with implementation, we have SalesMachine. That is a separate decision and a separate contract. We do not deduct the cost of the audit from the implementation, because we do not want the audit to be a pretext for selling anything else.
Read-only access to the CRM, an export of opportunities with stage change history for the last 12 months, recordings of sales calls (if you have them), the last five proposals, documents describing the process and the segments, and data on plan delivery by salesperson.
If some of this does not exist, that is an audit finding too. We record it as missing evidence, not as a missing problem. We sign an NDA if you need one, and we delete the data after the project is closed.
The classic definition requires an audit to be periodic. A one-off opinion with no repeat measurement does not meet that criterion. In practice, for a company of 10-50 people a sensible rhythm is a full audit once every 12 months and a shorter review after every major implementation.
That is why we offer a variant with a 90-day follow-up review: we go back to the same data and check what has actually changed.
It can, and it is worth trying. Most of the CRM data analysis can be done on your own. An internal audit has two limitations, though, that cannot be worked around: the person managing sales is assessing their own work, and the salespeople tell them what they think they want to hear.
Kotler wrote independence straight into the definition of an audit. If you do it internally, at least separate the roles: one person collects the data, another draws the conclusions.
Yes, and we believe that is how it should be. Interviews with salespeople are one of the pillars of the audit, and a conversation held under a pretext produces worthless answers.
The interviews are confidential. The report does not attribute statements to individuals unless someone explicitly agrees to it. The audit examines the sales system, it does not evaluate people. That distinction is worth communicating to the team at the start, because the quality of the answers depends on it.
It happens rarely, but it happens, and then that is a result too. A company that comes out at level 3 or higher in all five areas gets the information that the problem lies outside sales: in the business model, in the product or in the market.
We will say so plainly and we will not look for a justification for further work. That is why we hold a free conversation before the audit: so as not to sell an examination to a company that does not need it.
B2B technology and service companies with 10-50 people: software houses, IT and implementation companies, companies built on specialist expertise. Long, consultative sales with several decision-makers on the client side.
We do not audit e-commerce, self-service SaaS or retail. That is a different sales mechanic.
Intuitive selling has a ceiling
Until you know in which of the five areas you really lose clients, every change is a guess. Start with a conversation.
One conversation, no obligations.